A problem arises when this model of
care is applied to chronic, incurable, progressive diseases such as
Parkinson’s. Within chronic care the patient, who is likely a medical novice,
becomes responsible for day to day treatment and the Doctor is relatively
passive; the gap between a patient’s medical training and the burden of chronic
care is troubling. Shockingly, I was offered no psychological support when I
was diagnosed and I was left to the wilderness of the internet (whose content
doesn’t have a conscience) to understand what was happening to me. Charities
such as Parkinson’s UK do step into the breach but I wonder whether some sort
of meeting with Doctors and other health professionals can be arranged a week
after diagnosis where patients and their families are taught something of the
disease, can ask questions and are set up with some of the tools needed to
shoulder the burden of chronic care. Reading a leaflet or a web site, although
useful, is a one way conversation.
I am very grateful for the input of
my Physio and Occupational therapists (thank you Laura and Mairi!) but it seems
I’ve used up my short term intervention tokens because this is gradually stopping.
But, Parkinson’s is a shifting disease (new challenges will arise) so the short
term intervention model is inappropriate. Also, given the chronic nature of
Parkinson’s it will benefit both patient and health professional if a patient
could see the same person each time; building trust is crucial in all medical
interactions but especially dealing with chronic disease.
I heartily agree. Both Facebook and face to face Parkinson's support groups have been helpful to me here in the US, but having a single knowledgeable person in the form of my neuropsychologist (therapist) has been a life saver!
ReplyDelete